Wednesday, February 16, 2011

SUMMARY OF FOUR DIFFERENT RULES (OR PROPOSED RULES) RELATING TO 401(K) FEE DISCLOSURE OR INVESTMENT ADVICE GUIDANCE

Charles C. Shulman, Esq., LLC
Employee Benefits, Employment & Executive Compensation Law
www.ebeclaw.com  www.EmployeeBenefitsLaw.info


<><>
632 Norfolk St., Teaneck, NJ 07666
NJ Tel - 201-357-0577
(rings in office & on cell)
Fax - 201-836-4847
NY Office:
345
Seventh Ave.
, 21 Fl., New York, NY
NY Tel – 212-380-3834
E-mail - cshulman@ebeclaw.com
Admitted in NY & NJ


EBEC (Employee Benefits / Executive Compensation) Law Update

August 17, 2010
Updated December 19, 2010

SUMMARY OF FOUR DIFFERENT RULES (OR PROPOSED RULES) RELATING
TO 401(K) FEE DISCLOSURE OR INVESTMENT ADVICE GUIDANCE

            Recent guidance – some proposed and some final – relate to 401(k) plan fee disclosure and investment advice, as described further below:
  • Service provider disclosure on Form 5500 Schedule C is now required for both direct and indirect compensation.  This became effective with the 5500s for the 2009 plan years.
  • Fee disclosure by service providers to responsible plan fiduciaries to show reasonableness of contract (required by service-provider exemption of ERISA § 408(b)(2)) as specified in interim final DOL regulations published in July of this year will become effective July 16, 2011.
  • Fee disclosure by fiduciaries to participants for participant-directed 401(k) plans regarding investment options with a comparative chart of investment options and with the administrative expenses of each option is required under DOL regulations proposed in July 2008 and finalized in Oct. 2010.
  • Regulations regarding investment advice arrangements that are permitted by the Pension Protection Act where there is level-fee or computer model arrangements have been reproposed in March 2010.  They were originally finalized in January 2009 but were later withdrawn.  The reproposed regulations are similar to the original regulations but with certain changes as described below.

      1.  Schedule C Service Provider Reporting – Effective for 2009 Plan Years  
            Final guidance for revised Form 5500 Schedule C disclosure provides for expanded requirements for service providers reporting of direct and indirect compensation, and requires fiduciaries to review and approve expenses, effective for 5500s relating to plan years beginning in 2009. 
  • For Schedule C purposes, reportable compensation includes cash and any other items of value (e.g., gifts or awards) received from the plan (including fees charged as a percentage of assets and deducted from investment returns) in connection with services rendered to the plan.  
  • Indirect compensation is compensation received from sources other than the plan or plan sponsor, in connection with services rendered to the plan, and would include, for example, fees and expense reimbursement payments received from a mutual fund, account maintenance fees, 12b–1 distribution fees, etc.[1]

2.  Fee Disclosure for Service Providers – Interim Final Regulations Effective July 16, 2011
ERISA § 406 generally prohibits transactions between an ERISA plan and a party in interest.  A service provider to a plan would be a party in interest, making the arrangement a prohibited transaction.  However, under the service-provider exception, ERISA § 408(b)(2) exempts service contracts or arrangements between a plan and a party in interest if (i) the contract or arrangement is reasonable, (ii) the services are necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan, and (iii) no more than reasonable compensation is paid for the services.[2]
DOL regulations § 2550.408b-2, proposed in December 2007[3] and substantially revised as interim regulations in July 2010[4]  amends DOL Reg. § 2550.408b–2 to clarify the meaning of a ‘‘reasonable’’ contract or arrangement.
Under the interim DOL regulations, to be a reasonable contract, a “covered service provider” (as defined below) must disclose in writing to the “responsible plan fiduciary” (the fiduciary with authority to cause the plan to enter into or renew the contract) certain information. 

·         This disclosure is in order for the fiduciary to be able to determine that the services are reasonable.

A “covered service provider” is a service provider that enters into a contract or arrangement with a covered plan (which is defined as an ERISA pension plan) and reasonably expects $1,000 or more in direct or indirect compensation to be received in connection with providing certain enumerated services, which are services provided as a fiduciary to an investment contract, product or other entity holding plan assets, services provided as an investment advisor  to the plan, certain recordkeeping and brokerage services and other services for which service provider, affiliate or subcontractor expect to receive indirect compensation. DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(iii).

The disclosure must describe:

·         services to be provided (but not including non-fiduciary services to an investment contract or plan investment);

·         if applicable, status as a fiduciary or investment advisor;

·         any direct or indirect compensation the service provider, affiliate, or subcontractor expects to receive, or in certain cases any compensation that will be paid between the service provider, affiliate and a subcontractor in connection with the services (e.g., bundled services such as commissions, 12b-1 fees, soft dollar fees, etc.);

·         compensation expected in connection with termination of the contract;

·         with regard to recordkeeping services a description of direct and indirect compensation that is expected to be received;

·         whether the plan will be billed or the compensation will be deducted directly from the plan’s individual accounts;

·         for fiduciary service providers with respect to plan assets, any compensation that will be charged directly against the amount invested in connection with the acquisition, sale, or withdrawal of the investment (e.g., sales charges, loads, redemption fees, surrender charges, etc.) and operating expenses; and

·         for certain recordkeeping and brokerage services with respect to each designated investment alternative, current accurate disclosure materials of the issuer of the designated investment alternative that includes the information in the previous bullet.[5] 

The service provider must disclose any additional information relating to compensation to the responsible plan fiduciary within the following time periods: (i) reasonably in advance of the date of contract or renewed, (ii) within 30 days of when the investment holds plan assets, and (iii) as soon as an investment alternative is designated.[6]  Changes in the disclosed information must be communicated no later than 60 days from the date of change.[7]  

Upon request, the service provider must furnish other information relating to the compensation received in connection with the contract.[8]  Good faith errors or omission in disclosing the information required will not cause there to be a failure, as long as the service provider discloses the correct information as soon as practicable and no later than 30 days after the service provider knows of such error or omission.[9]

There is an exemption in the form of a prohibited transaction class exemption, and also incorporated into the interim regulations, for the responsible plan fiduciary from the prohibited transaction restrictions for a party in interest providing goods and services to or receiving assets from the plan, for any failure by a covered service provider to disclose the information required above, provided that the following conditions are met: (i) the plan fiduciary did not know that the service provider failed or would fail to make required disclosures and reasonably believed that the covered service provider disclosed the information required above, (ii) the plan fiduciary requests the additional information in writing and notifies  the DOL, and (iii) the service provider terminates the arrangement or complies with the request within 90 days.  DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(ix).  The above administrative class exemption was proposed in December 2007[10] and finalized in July 2010.[11]

                The interim regulations also require that for the contract to be reasonable, it must permit termination of the contract without penalty other than for reasonable start-up costs and expenses.[12]  

The interim regulations will not be effective until July 16, 2011. The rules will then apply to all contracts or arrangements, regardless of whether entered into before or after the effective date.

      3.  Fee Disclosure for Participants – Final Regulations (Generally Effective 1/1/2012)
            Generally.  The Department of Labor has issued regulations – proposed in 2008[13] and finalized in 2010[14] – requiring fiduciaries of individual account plans to provide specific disclosures to participants concerning plan investment options including fee and expense information.  The concern is that participants in individual account plans be given sufficient information on investment choices including fees and expenses.[15]
The regulations provide that when a plan allocates investment responsibilities to participants under a participant directed individual account plan, the plan administrator must make sure that participants are made aware of their rights and responsibilities with respect to the investment of assets, and that sufficient information is provided regarding the plan and the plan's investment options including fee and expense information to make informed decisions how to invest their accounts.[16]
The plan administrator must provide participants certain plan-related information and certain investment-related information, as described below.[17]  
Plan-Related Information.   The plan-related information that must be disclosed includes:
·         general plan information about structure and mechanics of plan, such as how to give investment instructions, list of plan's current investment options, description of any "brokerage windows" or similar arrangement that enables the selection of investments beyond those designated by the plan, etc;[18] 
·         administrative expenses information about fees and expenses for general plan administrative services that may be charged to individual accounts, such as fees and expenses for legal, accounting, and recordkeeping services;[19]  and
·         individual expense information including fees and expenses that may be charged to individual account of participant, such as fees for plan loans and for processing QDROs.[20]
This information must be given to participants on or before the date they can direct their investments, and then annually thereafter.[21] 
Statements must be furnished to participants at least quarterly showing the dollar amount of the plan-related administrative and individual fees and expenses actually charged to the individual accounts, as well as a description of the services.  These disclosures may be included in quarterly benefit statements required under ERISA § 105.[22] 
Investment-Related Information.  In addition to plan-related information, investment-related information must also be disclosed under the regulations.[23]   This includes:
·         performance data, with historical investment performance; one, five and ten-year returns must be provided for investment options that do not have fixed rates of return (such as mutual funds), and for investment options that have a fixed rate of return the annual rate of return must be provided;[24]
·         benchmark information for investment options that do not have a fixed rate of return, with the returns of an appropriate broad-based securities market index over one-, five-, and ten-year periods (investment options with fixed rates of return are not subject to this requirement);[25]
·         fee and expense information, which for investment options that do not a have a fixed rate of return requires total annual operating expenses expressed as both a percentage of assets and as a dollar amount and any shareholder-type fees or restrictions on the participant's ability to purchase or withdraw from the investment; for investment options that have a fixed rate of return, any shareholder-type fees or restrictions on the participant's ability to purchase or withdraw from the investment is required;[26]
·         Internet website address must be included for investment-related information, which will provide participants access to specific additional information about the investment options if more current information is desired;[27] and
·         a glossary of investment-related terms to understand the plan's investment options, or an Internet website address that provides access to such a glossary.[28]
Comparative Format Requirement.  Investment-related information must be furnished on or before the date participants can first direct their investments, and annually thereafter; this information must be furnished in a chart format to facilitate comparison of investment options. The regulations include an appendix with a model comparative chart.[29]
Effective Dates.  The final regulations become effective on December 20, 2010.  They become applicable to covered individual account plans for plan years beginning on or after November 1, 2011.[30]

      4.  Eligible Investment Advice Arrangements by Fiduciary Advisors Under Pension Protection Act  –Regulations Withdrawn and then Reproposed
Under ERISA § 408, as amended by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, a prohibited transaction statutory exemption is added for the provision of investment advice by a “fiduciary advisor” to participants of participant-directed plans through an “eligible investment advice arrangement.”  ERISA §§ 408(b)(14) & 408(g). 
In January 2009 the Department of Labor finalized regulations implementing the provisions of the statutory exemption for eligible investment advice arrangements for level-fee or computer model arrangements (as described below).[31]  The DOL also provided an administrative class exemption in DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(d), pursuant to which the fee-leveling or computer model requirements would be liberalized.  The effective date was to have been March 23, 2009.   The effective date was delayed several times.[32]  The DOL withdrew these regulations entirely effective January 19, 2010 (before the extended effective date of the regulations).[33]
The regulations were reproposed in March of 2010.[34]  Reproposed DOL Reg. § 2550.408g–1 follows the requirements of ERISA § 408(g) that must be satisfied in order for the investment advice-related arrangements to be exempt from the prohibited transaction restrictions of § 406.  
“Eligible investment advice arrangements” must either:  (i) be based on generally accepted investment theories, taking into account fees and expenses and the participants’ age, other assets, risk tolerance and preferences, and must also provide that fees received by fiduciary advisors providing investment advice do not vary on the basis of the investments chosen (level fee arrangements);[35] or (ii) use a computer model that provides generally accepted investment theories, use relevant information about participants, take into account fees and expenses, use appropriate objective criteria, not favor investment options of the advisor and take into account all of the investment options of the plan, and in addition, the computer model must be certified by an eligible investment expert.[36] 
A plan fiduciary must expressly authorize the investment advice program, and an annual audit of the arrangement must be made.[37]  
The fiduciary advisor must disclose to participants prior to the initial investment advice the following: (i) the role of any party that has a material affiliation, (ii) past performance of the investment options, (iii) fees or compensation that the advisor or affiliate receives for the advice or for a transaction or rollover involving the investment, (iv) any material affiliation the fiduciary or affiliate has in the funds, and (v) certain other matters.[38]  The Appendix to Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1 contains a model disclosure form that may be used to satisfy this disclosure requirement. 
A “fiduciary advisor” is a registered investment advisor, bank, insurance company, registered broker dealer or an affiliate or employee of any of the above.[39]   
The proposed regulations address the requirements for electing to be treated as the only fiduciary and fiduciary adviser by reason of developing or marketing a computer model or an investment advice program used in an eligible investment advice arrangement. [40] 

A prohibited transaction class exemption in the original 2009 regulations would have permitted follow-up individual advice subsequent to the computer model, and would have also permitted varying fees as long as the individual employee providing the advice met the level fee requirements.  However, in response to comments questioning the potential for self-dealing, the class exemption has been eliminated in the reproposed regulations.

The regulations will most likely be effective 60 days after finalization and publication of the final regulations in the Federal Register.[41] 

            IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter that is contained in this document.


[1]     72 Fed. Reg. 64710 (Nov.16, 2007), amending DOL Reg. §§ 2520.103-1 & 2520.104-46. 
      Note that the various references to regulations or proposed regulations in the footnotes below are hyperlinked to the original texts in the Federal Register.
[2]     A related rule also added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 adds ERISA § 408(b)(17) provides that if a person  is a party-in-interest solely by reason of providing services to the plan, and is not an investment advisor to the plan, then transactions under ERISA § 406(a)(i)(A), (B) or (D) (sale, exchange, lease or loan) will not be prohibited, so long as the plan pays no more than, and receives no less than adequate consideration.  There are currently no regulations regarding § 408(b)(17).
[3]     72 Fed. Reg. 70988 (Dec 13, 2007).  The proposed regulations had been put on hold in connection with President Obama’s January 2009 sixty day regulatory moratorium for proposed regulations and regulations not yet effective. 74 Fed. Reg. 4435 (Jan. 26, 2009).    
[4]     75 Fed. Reg. 41600 (July 16, 2010).
[5]     DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(iv).
[6]     DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(v). 
[7]     Id.
[8]     DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(vi).
[9]     DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(1)(vii).
[10]    72 Fed. Reg. 70893 (Dec. 13, 2007).
[11]    75 Fed. Reg. 41600 (July 16, 2010). 
[12]    DOL Reg. § 2550.408b-2(c)(3).
[13]    DOL Reg. §§ 2550.404a-5 and 2550.404c-1, 73 Fed. Reg. 43014 (July 23, 2008). 
[14]    DOL Reg. §§ 2550.404a-5 and 2550.404c-1, 75 Fed. Reg. 64910 (Oct. 20, 2010). 
[15]    Preamble to regulations, 75 Fed. Reg. at 64910.
[16]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(a).
[17]    Id.
[18]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(c)(1).
[19]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(c)(2).
[20]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(c)(3).
[21]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(c)(1)(i), (c)(2)(i) & (c)(3)(i).
[22]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(c)(2)(ii) & -5(c)(3)(ii).
[23]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d).
[24]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(1)(ii).
[25]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(1)(iii).
[26]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(1)(iv).
[27]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(1)(v).
[28]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(1)(vi).
[29]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(d)(2).
[30]    DOL Reg. § 2550.404a-5(j).
[31]    74 Fed. Reg. 3822 (Jan. 21, 2009) (DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1 & -2), originally proposed in 73 Fed. Reg. 49896 (Aug 22, 2008).
[32]    It was delayed 60 days to May 22, 2009, 74 Fed. Reg. 11847 (March 20, 2009), per President Obama’s regulatory moratorium (74 Fed. Reg. 4435 (Jan. 26, 2009)), it was deferred another 180 days to November 18, 2009, 74 Fed. Reg. 23951 (May 20, 2009), and it was deferred another 180 days until May 17, 2010, 74 Fed. Reg. 59092 (Nov. 17, 2009).
[33]    74 Fed. Reg. 60156 (Nov. 20, 2009).
[34]    75 Fed. Reg. 9360 (March 2, 2010).
[35]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(b)(3). See similarly, ERISA § 408(g)(2). 

      The reproposed regulations provide that, as stated in DOL Field Assistance Bulletin 2007-01 (Feb. 2, 2007),  the receipt by a fiduciary adviser of any payment from any party or used for the benefit of such fiduciary adviser that is based on investments selected by participants would be inconsistent with the fee-leveling requirement of the exemption.

[36]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(b)(4). See similarly, ERISA § 408(g)(3).
      The reproposed regulation also provide, in connection with investment advice arrangements that use computer models, that a computer model shall be designed and operated to avoid investment recommendations that inappropriately distinguish among investment options within a single asset class on the basis of a factor that cannot confidently be expected to persist in the future.
[37]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(b)(5) & (6).  See similarly, ERISA § 408(g)(4) & (5).
[38]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(b)(7).  See similarly, ERISA § 408(g)(6).
[39]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g-1(c)(2).  See similarly, ERISA § 408(g)(11).
[40]    Prop. DOL Reg. § 2550.408g–2.
[41]    Pending final regulations the statutory exemption for investment advice provided by the PPA is still in effect (for advice after 2006), and a good faith compliance should suffice until regulations are refinalized.     The withdrawal of the regulations and exemption does not negate the statutory exemption in ERISA §§ 408(b)(14) & 408(g) provided for by the PPA for eligible investment advice arrangements.  Note that the guidance in DOL Field Assistance Bulletin 2007-01 can also be be relied upon pending final regulations.

2011 Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Pension Plan and Other Limits; Transportation Fringe Parity Extended One Year by Tax Relief Act

Charles C. Shulman, Esq., LLC
Employee Benefits, Employment & Executive Compensation Law
www.ebeclaw.com  www.EmployeeBenefitsLaw.info


<><>
632 Norfolk St., Teaneck, NJ 07666
NJ Tel - 201-357-0577
(rings in office & on cell)
Fax - 201-836-4847
NY Office:
345
Seventh Ave.
, 21 Fl., New York, NY
NY Tel – 212-380-3834
E-mail - cshulman@ebeclaw.com
Admitted in NY & NJ


EBEC (Employee Benefits / Executive Compensation) Law Update
October 28, 2010
Updated Dec. 18, 2011
2011 Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Pension Plan and Other Limits;
Transportation Fringe Parity Extended One Year by Tax Relief Act
      1.   2011 COLA for Pension Plan Limits Unchanged or Changed Slightly.  This morning the IRS announced in IR-2010-108 that because the cost of living for the quarter ending Sept. 30, 2010 was lower than the cost of living in quarter ending Sept. 30, 2008 (although it was slightly higher than the cost of living for quarter ending Sept. 30, 2009), the pension plan limits for 2011 adjusted by IRC § 415(d) will remain unchanged at the 2010 and 2009 level.  Certain other limits relating to retirement plans adjusted by other provisions will increase slightly.
Pension Plan Limits Adjusted by IRC § 415(d)

2011 Amounts
(Same as 2010 & 2009)
Annual benefits limit for defined benefit plans – Code § 415 (b)
$195,000
Annual contributions limit for defined contribution plans – Code § 415(c)
$49,000
Elective deferral max for 401(k), 403(b) & 457(b) plans – Code § 402(g)
$16,500
Elective deferral limit for SIMPLE plans – Code § 408(p)
$11,500
Age 50 catch-up contributions – Code § 414(v)
$5,500
Highly-compensated employee threshold – Code § 414(q)
$110,000
Annual compensation limit – Code § 401(a)(17)
$245,000
Key-employee threshold for top heavy plan - § 416(i)
$160,000
ESOP account balance for 5-year / 1-year distribution rule under IRC § 409(o)(1)(C)(ii)
$985,000 &
$195,000

      See also IRS COLA chart
      The following pension-related amounts adjusted under IRC § 1(f)(3) have been increased slightly:
     

Pension-Related Amounts Adjusted under § 1(f)(3)

2010 Amount

2011 Amount
Phase-out for deductions for IRA for married couples filing jointly, in which the spouse who makes the IRA contribution is an active participant in an employer-sponsored retirement plan
$89,000 to
$109,000
$90,000  to
$110,000
Adjusted gross income (AGI) phase-out range for married joint filers taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA
$167,000 to
$177,000
$169,000 to
179,000
AGI limit for retirement savings contributions credit for married couples filing jointly
$55,500
$56,500
IRC § 430(c)(7)(D)(i)(II) amount for determining excess employee compensation for defined benefit plans where election has been made
$1,000,000
$1,014,000


      2.   2011 Health Savings Account (HSA) Contribution Limits Unchanged.  As announced in June in Rev. Proc. 2010-22, health savings account (HSA) contribution limits for 2011 will have no cost-of living adjustments in 2011 and will remain at a maximum single contribution limit of $3,050 and a maximum family contribution limit of $6,150.
      3.   PBGC Maximum Insurance Benefit and PBGC Premiums Unchanged.  As announced last week, the PBGC maximum insurance benefit is unchanged for 2011 at $54,000 per year ($4,500 per month).   PBGC News Release (Oct. 19, 2010).
      The PBGC flat-rate premium for 2011 is also unchanged at $35 for a single-employer plan and $9 for multiemployer plans.  PBGC – What’s New – Oct. 19, 2011
      4.   Social Security Taxable Wage Base Unchanged.  The Social Security Administration announced in a press release and fact sheet, issued October 15, 2010, that there will be no automatic cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits in 2011.  Similarly, the social security taxable wage base (subject to the 6.2% social security tax) is unchanged at $106,800.  Also, the annual earnings test remains $14,160 prior to normal retirement and $37,680 at normal retirement age.
      5.   Transit Passes and Van Pooling Remains at $230 for One More Year.  The  cost-of-living adjustment for qualified transportation limits under Code § 132(f) had not been announced in Rev. Proc. 2010-41, but would presumably have been unchanged at $230 for qualified parking benefits and $120 for transit passes and van pooling.  However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided for temporary parity between public transit/van-pooling and parking, so that the monthly limitation for transit passes and van pooling was the same as for qualified parking benefits - $230 – through December 31, 2010.  The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 enacted Dec. 18, 2010, extends this increased $230 limit for transit passes and van pooling through December 31, 2011.  The $230 dollar amount is presumably unchanged by cost-of-living for 2011.
      If you have any questions regarding the above or any other matter, please contact me at the number listed above.
                                                                        Charles C. Shulman

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter that is contained in this document.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROVISIONS OF DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2010

Charles C. Shulman, Esq., LLC
Employee Benefits, Employment & Executive Compensation Law
www.EBEClaw.com


<><>
632 Norfolk St., Teaneck, NJ 07666
NJ Tel - 201-357-0577
(rings in office & on cell)
Fax - 201-836-4847
NY Office:
345 Seventh Ave., 21 Fl., New York, NY 10001
NY Tel – 212-380-3834
E-mail - cshulman@ebeclaw.com
Admitted in NY & NJ


EBEC (Employee Benefits / Executive Compensation) Law Update
[December 15, 2010]
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROVISIONS OF DODD-FRANK
WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2010

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, P.L. 111-203, H.R. 4173, signed July 21, 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act” or “Act”), contains say-on-pay and other shareholder-accountability executive compensation proxy rules.
1.   Say-on-Pay.  Section 951 of Dodd-Frank Act adds new § 14A(a) (15 USC §78n-1(b)) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that a non-binding shareholder vote on executive compensation must be held every 1,2 or 3 years (with frequency elected in a separate shareholder vote at least once every 6 years).
The “say-on-pay” vote is on compensation of named executive officers as disclosed in the executive compensation disclosure of the proxy.
The say on pay vote is non-binding – it is advisory only – and it does not create any additional fiduciary duties. Previously, optional say on pay votes required a preliminary proxy. A preliminary proxy will not be required for mandatory say on pay vote, according to proposed rules as discussed below.
2.   Say-On-Golden Parachutes.  Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act adds § 14A(b) to the Securities Exchange Act that a proxy or consent solicitation with a shareholder vote to approve a transaction, requires disclosure and a separate non-binding vote for any agreements with named executive officers relating to compensation (present, deferred or contingent) that is based on or relates to an acquisition, merger, consolidation, sale or other disposition of substantially of all the assets (“golden parachutes”) and the total of such compensation that may be paid out.
3.   Effective Date.  The various shareholder vote requirements such as say on pay, frequency of vote and say on golden parachute become effective on the first shareholder meeting occurring on or after January 21, 2011 (6 months after enactment of Dodd-Frank Act). No rulemaking is required to trigger the effective date.
4.   Proposed Regulations on Say-on-Pay.  The SEC released proposed rules and amendments to rules relating to the above say-on-pay and say-on-golden parachute requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. 17 CFR Parts 229, 240 and 249, 75 Fed. Reg. 66590 (Oct. 28, 2010). (All references below to regulations are to these proposed regulations and proposed amendments to regulations.)
a.  Annual Proxies. Say-on-Pay is only required in proxies for election of directors.
b.  Say on all NEO 402 Pay.  Vote of say-on-pay is for all Item 402 compensation for named executive officers (including CD&A, tables are other narrative disclosure under Item 402 Rule 14(a)-21(a), 17 CFR § 240-14a-21(a). This vote is not required for director compensation.
c.  Vote.  The vote is on approval of compensation of executives as disclosed under Item 402 of Reg. S-K.
d.   Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote. Choice of voting frequency is one year, two years or three years (and shareholder can also abstain). Rule 14a-21(b).
e.   No Preliminary Proxy. No preliminary proxy is required for shareholder say-on-pay vote or frequency vote. Rule 14a-6(a).
f.  Compensation Discussion & Analysis. Item 402(b) is changed so that disclosure is required in CD&A as to whether and how the company’s compensation policy takes into account the prior say on pay vote.
5.            Proposed Regulations on Say on Golden Parachute.  These proposed rules also govern say on golden parachutes.
a.       Separate Vote in Transaction Proxy. Proposed rules provide that in a proxy or consent solicitation to approve an acquisition, merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of assets, a separate shareholder vote is required to approve any type of compensation (whether present, deferred or contingent) that is based on or relates to the transaction. 17 CFR § 240.14a-21(c) & § 229.402(t)(1)
b.       Separate Golden Parachute Vote Not Required if Already Approved in Annual Proxy. The vote on golden parachutes is not required if such golden parachutes were already approved in the regular annual (or bi or tri-annual) proxy vote assuming the applicable 402(t) golden parachute chart has been included in  the annual proxy.  17 CFR § 240.14a-21.
c.       Golden Parachute Table. Golden parachute compensation disclosure, where required, shall include under proposed Item 402(t) a golden parachute compensation table with the named executive officers and the dollar value of cash severance, accelerated stock options, and other  stocks awards, payments in cancellation of such awards, pension and deferred compensation benefit enhancements, prerequisites, tax reimbursements (such as 280G gross-ups) and other personal benefits, and any other compensation payable on account of the transaction. 17 CFR § 229.402(t).
d.       Footnotes to Golden Parachute Table.  Footnote should disclose each separate form of compensation and shall indicate if it is a single trigger or a double trigger.  Even change in control compensation from broad-based plans must be disclosed to the extent it affects the named executive officers.
e.       Narrative Golden Parachute Disclosure. Item 402(t)(3) requires narrative description of material factors applicable to the change in control payments in the chart, including conditions of payment, form of payment, noncompetes and confidentiality agreements.
6.   Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation – Expanded Clawbacks.  Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act adds securities Exchange Act § 10D, which instructs the SEC to direct the listing exchanges to require of the listed companies:
a. Disclosure of the company’s policy regarding incentive compensation based on reported financial information; and
b. Recoupment (clawback) from any current or former executive officer of any incentive compensation paid during the past three years based on erroneous data if the company is required to restate the financials; the recoupment is for the excess of the amount of incentive compensation paid based on the erroneous financial information over what would have been payable under the corrected financial information.
Note that the Dodd-Frank Act clawback is broader than the Sarbanes-Oxley Act clawback in that under Dodd-Frank it applies to erroneous information whether or not there was misconduct, it goes back three years instead of 12 months and it applies to all executive officers not just named executive officers.
7.        Compensation Committees and Compensation Consultant are Advisor Independence.
a.       Compensation Committee Independence. Section 952 of Dodd-Frank Act adds §10C(a) of the Securities Exchange Act instructing stock exchanges to require that listed companies have compensation committee members who are Board members and are also “independent”. The respective stock exchanges will define independent considering compensation paid to the committee members (e.g. consulting or advisory fees) and whether the committee member is affiliated with the company.
A compensation consultant or other advisor may be selected only after the compensation committee has taken into account relevant factors determining independence including: (i) provision of other services to the company by the entity that employs the consultant or advisor; (ii) fees received from the company as a percentage of the total revenue of the entity that employs the consultant or advisor; (iii) policies of the entity employing the consultant or advisor; (iv) any business or personal relationship between the compensation committee and the consultant or advisor; and (v) any stock of the company owned by the compensation consultant or advisor.
b. Authority to Retain Compensation Consultants and Advisors.  Section 952 also adds Securities Exchange Act §§ 10C(c) and (d) that a compensation committee may in its sole discretion retain a compensation consultant legal counsel or other advisors. The compensation committee will be directly responsible for appointment, compensation and    oversight of the work of the consultant or advisor. (The annual proxy must disclose    whether the compensation committee has engaged a compensation consultant and whether there are any conflicts of interest.)
c. Funding Section 10C(e) provides that the company shall provide appropriate funding for reasonable compensation of the committee’s compensation consultant and advisors.
d.  Requirement of Listing Companies and Effective Date  The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the SEC must adopt rules by 360 days after enactment (July 16, 2011) providing that securities exchanges shall prohibit security listing by companies not in compliance with these compensation consultant & advisor rules. § 10C(f).
8. Hedging Disclosure. The proxy must contain a policy regarding permissibility of employees or directors purchasing derivatives to hedge against equity grants. Section 955 of Dodd-Frank Act adding § 14(j) of  the Securities Exchange Act.
9. Joint or Separate CEO & Chairman. Under § 972 of the Dodd-Frank Act  rules are to be issued within 180 days of enactment (Jan. 17, 2011) requiring listed company proxies to disclose why CEO and Chairman are the same person or two separate people.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter that is contained in this document.